Head, Footer and Post Injections vs Simple History – Track, Log, and Audit WordPress Changes: Which Is Faster for WordPress?
Head, Footer and Post Injections
B-300K+ installs · 4.9/5 rating
VS
Simple History – Track, Log, and Audit WordPress Changes
B300K+ installs · 4.9/5 rating
Overall Winner
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Head, Footer and Post Injections | Simple History – Track, Log, and Audit WordPress Changes |
|---|---|---|
| Active Installs | 300K+ | 300K+ |
| User Rating | 4.9/5 | 4.9/5 |
| Speed Score | B- | B |
| Tested Up To | WP 6.9.1 | WP 6.9.1 |
| Requires PHP | 7.0 | 7.4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-02-03 | 2025-12-18 |
| Total Downloads | 5.5M+ | 10.9M+ |
Verdict
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is faster, Head, Footer and Post Injections or Simple History u2013 Track, Log, and Audit WordPress Changes?
Based on our heuristic analysis, Simple History u2013 Track, Log, and Audit WordPress Changes scores better on speed metrics.
Which should I use, Head, Footer and Post Injections or Simple History u2013 Track, Log, and Audit WordPress Changes?
Simple History u2013 Track, Log, and Audit WordPress Changes is our overall recommendation based on speed, features, and user ratings.
Get WordPress Performance Tips
Plugin reviews, speed optimization guides, and error debugging — straight to your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We respect your privacy.