Limit Login Attempts Reloaded – Login Security, Brute Force Protection, Firewall vs Loginizer: Which Is Faster for WordPress?

Limit Login Attempts Reloaded – Login Security, Brute Force Protection, Firewall vs Loginizer - MakeWPFast
Limit Login Attempts Reloaded – Login Security, Brute Force Protection, Firewall
A
2M+ installs · 4.9/5 rating
Overall Winner
VS
Loginizer
A
1M+ installs · 4.8/5 rating

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureLimit Login Attempts Reloaded – Login Security, Brute Force Protection, FirewallLoginizer
Active Installs2.0M+1.0M+
User Rating4.9/54.8/5
Speed ScoreB-C
Tested Up ToWP 6.9.1WP 6.9.1
Requires PHPN/A5.5
Last Updated2026-01-122025-12-09
Total Downloads79.2M+29.0M+
Verdict
FasterLimit-login-attempts-reloaded
More FeaturesLimit-login-attempts-reloaded
Overall WinnerLimit-login-attempts-reloaded

Limit Login Attempts Reloaded vs Loginizer: Which Brute Force Plugin Actually Matters?

Both Limit Login Attempts Reloaded (LLAR) and Loginizer do the same fundamental thing: they count failed login attempts and lock out IPs that cross a threshold. That is the entire value proposition. The question is which one does it better without creating new problems for your site.

The Core Difference

LLAR has leaned hard into cloud-based intelligence. Its network of 2.5 million+ sites shares IP reputation data, so your site benefits from threat data collected across the entire user base. Loginizer takes a more traditional, self-contained approach with local IP tracking, but adds features LLAR lacks entirely: login URL renaming (changing /wp-login.php to a custom slug) and two-factor authentication via email or authenticator apps.

If you care about login hardening beyond attempt limiting, Loginizer bundles more out of the box. If you want smarter, crowd-sourced blocking, LLAR is the clear winner.

Feature Comparison

  • LLAR Free: Configurable lockout rules, XMLRPC protection, WooCommerce login support, basic lockout logs, IP whitelist/blacklist
  • LLAR Premium: Cloud-based IP denylist, country blocking, IP intelligence, successful login logs with geolocation, cloud backups of IP data, admin unlock via cloud
  • Loginizer Free: Brute force protection (3 attempts/15 min lockout), IP blacklist/whitelist, reCAPTCHA v2/v3, Cloudflare Turnstile, passwordless login
  • Loginizer Premium: Login URL renaming, two-factor auth, social login, challenge questions, CSRF protection, XML-RPC disable toggle

Performance Impact

Neither plugin will slow your frontend down. Both hook into the login process only, meaning zero database queries or processing on regular page loads. LLAR’s cloud features add a small external API call during login events, but that is irrelevant to visitor-facing performance. For a performance-focused site, either is fine to run without guilt.

Security Track Record

This is where Loginizer takes a serious hit. In October 2020, researchers discovered CVE-2020-27615: an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in Loginizer’s brute force logging. The irony was brutal — the security plugin itself was the attack vector. The flaw existed in the loginizer_login_failed function, where usernames were passed unsanitized into SQL queries. WordPress.org took the rare step of force-updating Loginizer across all one million installs.

LLAR has not had a comparable incident. No forced updates, no critical CVEs that made headlines. That does not mean it is invulnerable, but its track record is meaningfully cleaner.

Dashboard and UX

LLAR offers a modern dashboard with charts showing lockout activity over time, failed login trends, and country-level breakdowns. It feels like a product that gets regular design attention. Loginizer’s interface is functional but dated — plain tables and settings pages without much visual polish. If you manage multiple sites or want quick visibility into attack patterns, LLAR is noticeably better to work with day-to-day.

Free vs Premium: What Actually Matters

LLAR’s free tier handles basic brute force protection perfectly well for a single small site. The premium tier becomes worth it when you want the cloud denylist — essentially outsourcing threat intelligence instead of only reacting to attacks that hit your site directly. Pricing starts around $8/month for a single domain.

Loginizer’s free tier is arguably more generous feature-wise, with reCAPTCHA and passwordless login included. The premium unlock targets sites that need login URL obfuscation and 2FA without installing a separate plugin.

The Verdict

For most WordPress sites, Limit Login Attempts Reloaded is the better choice. It is more actively maintained, has 2.5x the install base, benefits from crowd-sourced IP intelligence, and has never had a security incident that required WordPress.org to force-push an update to a million sites. The dashboard alone makes monitoring easier.

Choose Loginizer only if you specifically need login URL renaming or built-in two-factor authentication and want to avoid installing additional plugins for those features. Just make sure you keep it updated — its history demands it.

Not sure which plugin is slowing you down?

WP Multitool's Slow Query Analyzer pinpoints exactly which plugins cause the most database load on your site.

Try WP Multitool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Limit Login Attempts Reloaded better than Loginizer?
For most sites, yes. LLAR has a more modern interface, cloud-based IP blacklisting that shares threat data across sites, and a cleaner security track record. Loginizer had a critical SQL injection vulnerability in 2020 (CVE-2020-27615) that forced WordPress.org to auto-update all 1M+ installations — an unprecedented step for a security plugin.
Do Limit Login Attempts Reloaded or Loginizer affect page speed?
Neither has meaningful impact on frontend performance. Both plugins only activate when someone accesses wp-login.php or xmlrpc.php — they add zero overhead to regular page loads for visitors. On our benchmarks, both show negligible TTFB and memory impact. Pick based on features, not performance.
Can I use Limit Login Attempts Reloaded with Wordfence?
You can, but it is redundant. Wordfence already includes brute force protection with the same login attempt limiting functionality. Running both means two plugins checking every login attempt against separate thresholds, which can cause confusing lockout behavior. If you have Wordfence, you do not need LLAR or Loginizer.
Does Loginizer still have security issues?
Loginizer has had multiple vulnerabilities: a critical SQL injection in 2020, XSS issues in 2023, and an authentication bypass in 2024. The plugin has been patched each time, but the pattern is concerning for software whose entire purpose is security. LLAR has had fewer reported vulnerabilities over the same period.
Get WordPress Performance Tips

Plugin reviews, speed optimization guides, and error debugging — straight to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We respect your privacy.