LiteSpeed Cache vs EWWW Image Optimizer: Which Is Faster for WordPress?

LiteSpeed Cache vs EWWW Image Optimizer - MakeWPFast
LiteSpeed Cache
B
7M+ installs · 4.8/5 rating
View full benchmark →
VS
EWWW Image Optimizer
C
1M+ installs · 4.8/5 rating
View full benchmark →
Head-to-Head Benchmark
MetricLiteSpeed CacheEWWW Image Optimizer
⚡ Activation TTFB+0 ms+-2 ms
⚡ Activation Memory+2 MB+2 MB
⚡ Activation Queries+4+16
🏠 Homepage TTFB+7 ms+4 ms
🏠 Homepage Memory+0 MB+4 MB
🏠 Homepage Queries+4+16
⚙️ WP Admin TTFB+4 ms+-1 ms
⚙️ WP Admin Memory+0 MB+0 MB
⚙️ WP Admin Queries+3+3

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureLiteSpeed CacheEWWW Image Optimizer
Active Installs7.0M+1.0M+
User Rating4.8/54.8/5
Speed ScoreA-A-
Tested Up ToWP 6.9.1WP 6.9.1
Requires PHP7.27.4
Last Updated2025-12-162026-02-11
Total Downloads124.0M+44.6M+
Verdict
More FeaturesLitespeed-cache

Not sure which plugin is slowing you down?

WP Multitool's Slow Query Analyzer pinpoints exactly which plugins cause the most database load on your site.

Try WP Multitool →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster, LiteSpeed Cache or EWWW Image Optimizer?
Both plugins score similarly on speed metrics.
Which should I use, LiteSpeed Cache or EWWW Image Optimizer?
Both are excellent choices. Pick based on your specific needs.
Get WordPress Performance Tips

Plugin reviews, speed optimization guides, and error debugging — straight to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We respect your privacy.