LiteSpeed Cache vs WP Super Cache: Which Is Faster for WordPress?

LiteSpeed Cache
A7M+ installs · 4.8/5 rating
VS
WP Super Cache
A1M+ installs · 4.3/5 rating
Overall Winner
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | LiteSpeed Cache | WP Super Cache |
|---|---|---|
| Active Installs | 7.0M+ | 1.0M+ |
| User Rating | 4.8/5 | 4.3/5 |
| TTFB Impact | +0ms | -1ms |
| Memory Impact | +2048KB | +0KB |
| Extra DB Queries | +4 | +0 |
| Speed Score | A | A |
| Tested Up To | WP 6.9.1 | WP 6.9.1 |
| Requires PHP | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| Last Updated | 2025-12-16 | 2025-11-11 |
| Total Downloads | 124.0M+ | 62.0M+ |
Verdict
⚡
Not sure which plugin is slowing you down?
WP Multitool's Slow Query Analyzer pinpoints exactly which plugins cause the most database load on your site.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is faster, LiteSpeed Cache or WP Super Cache?
In our benchmark tests, WP Super Cache adds only +-1ms to TTFB, while LiteSpeed Cache adds +0ms. WP Super Cache is the faster choice.
Which uses less memory, LiteSpeed Cache or WP Super Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache adds +2048KB to peak memory usage, while WP Super Cache adds +0KB.
How many extra database queries does each plugin add?
LiteSpeed Cache adds +4 queries per page load, while WP Super Cache adds +0 queries.
Which should I use, LiteSpeed Cache or WP Super Cache?
Based on our performance benchmarks and user ratings, WP Super Cache is our overall recommendation. However, both are solid choices u2014 pick based on your specific needs.
Get WordPress Performance Tips
Plugin reviews, speed optimization guides, and error debugging — straight to your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We respect your privacy.