Smush Image Optimization – Optimize Images | Compress & Lazy Load Images | Convert WebP & AVIF | Image CDN vs EWWW Image Optimizer: Which Is Faster for WordPress?
Smush Image Optimization – Optimize Images | Compress & Lazy Load Images | Convert WebP & AVIF | Image CDN
A1M+ installs · 4.8/5 rating
Overall Winner
VS
EWWW Image Optimizer
A-1M+ installs · 4.8/5 rating
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Smush Image Optimization – Optimize Images | Compress & Lazy Load Images | Convert WebP & AVIF | Image CDN | EWWW Image Optimizer |
|---|---|---|
| Active Installs | 1.0M+ | 1.0M+ |
| User Rating | 4.8/5 | 4.8/5 |
| TTFB Impact | -10ms | -2ms |
| Memory Impact | +0KB | +2048KB |
| Extra DB Queries | +0 | +16 |
| Speed Score | A | A- |
| Tested Up To | WP 6.9.1 | WP 6.9.1 |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-02-04 | 2026-02-11 |
| Total Downloads | 64.2M+ | 44.6M+ |
Verdict
⚡
Not sure which plugin is slowing you down?
WP Multitool's Slow Query Analyzer pinpoints exactly which plugins cause the most database load on your site.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is faster, Smush Image Optimization u2013 Optimize Images | Compress & Lazy Load Images | Convert WebP & AVIF | Image CDN or EWWW Image Optimizer?
In our benchmark tests, Smush Image Optimization u2013 Optimize Images | Compress & Lazy Load Images | Convert WebP & AVIF | Image CDN adds only +-10ms to TTFB, while EWWW Image Optimizer adds +-2ms. Smush Image Optimization u2013 Optimize Images | Compress & Lazy Load Images | Convert WebP & AVIF | Image CDN is the faster choice.
Which uses less memory, Smush Image Optimization u2013 Optimize Images | Compress & Lazy Load Images | Convert WebP & AVIF | Image CDN or EWWW Image Optimizer?
Smush Image Optimization u2013 Optimize Images | Compress & Lazy Load Images | Convert WebP & AVIF | Image CDN adds +0KB to peak memory usage, while EWWW Image Optimizer adds +2048KB.
How many extra database queries does each plugin add?
Smush Image Optimization u2013 Optimize Images | Compress & Lazy Load Images | Convert WebP & AVIF | Image CDN adds +0 queries per page load, while EWWW Image Optimizer adds +16 queries.
Which should I use, Smush Image Optimization u2013 Optimize Images | Compress & Lazy Load Images | Convert WebP & AVIF | Image CDN or EWWW Image Optimizer?
Based on our performance benchmarks and user ratings, Smush Image Optimization u2013 Optimize Images | Compress & Lazy Load Images | Convert WebP & AVIF | Image CDN is our overall recommendation. However, both are solid choices u2014 pick based on your specific needs.
Get WordPress Performance Tips
Plugin reviews, speed optimization guides, and error debugging — straight to your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We respect your privacy.