Machine Learning Antispam Review: A Speed Score That Holds Up

Machine Learning Antispam is a WordPress plugin. The Machine Learning Antispam Plugin uses Machine Learning to detect spam and adult content comments and mark them. Our 3-context benchmark shows it barely registers (-6ms TTFB on activation).
How is this scored?
Our Benchmark Methodology
Every speed score on MakeWPFast is based on real performance measurements, not estimates. We install each plugin on a clean WordPress 6.9 setup (PHP 8.3, MariaDB, GeneratePress theme) and measure two key metrics:
PHP Memory Usage — how much additional memory the plugin consumes per request. Each doubling of memory overhead costs 10 points. High memory usage can cause crashes on shared hosting and limits how many plugins you can safely run together.
Database Queries — how many extra SQL queries the plugin runs per page load. Each 10x increase in query overhead costs 25 points. More queries mean more database work, slower pages, and harder scaling.
The score uses a logarithmic scale — the first few extra queries or megabytes matter more than going from 100 to 110 queries. This reflects real-world impact: the jump from 4 to 14 queries is far more noticeable than 100 to 110.
| Grade | Score | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| A | 90–100 | Negligible impact. Safe to install on any hosting. |
| A- | 80–89 | Very light impact. Minimal overhead on any setup. |
| B+ / B / B- | 65–79 | Light impact. Adds some overhead but manageable on most setups. |
| C+ / C / C- | 50–64 | Moderate impact. May noticeably slow down budget hosting. |
| D+ / D | 35–49 | Heavy impact. Will affect page load times. Consider alternatives. |
| F | 0–34 | Severe impact. Significant resource usage that hurts performance. |
Plugins marked "Not Yet Tested" have not been benchmarked yet. We do not estimate or guess scores — if there is no measured data, there is no grade.
Note: Benchmarks measure a plugin in isolation on a clean install. Real-world impact varies based on your hosting, other plugins, and how the plugin is configured.
| Context | TTFB | Memory | Queries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Activation | +-6 ms | +0 MB | +0 |
| Homepage | +-5 ms | +0 MB | +0 |
| WP Admin | +16 ms | +0 MB | +0 |
Performance Analysis
Performance Impact
Machine Learning Antispam receives an estimated speed score of . Our real benchmark tests measured the following impact when activating this plugin:
- TTFB impact: +-6 ms
- Memory impact: +0.0 MB
- Additional DB queries: +0
Overall activation impact: low. This plugin adds minimal overhead to your WordPress site.
Maintenance Status
Last updated: 2014-04-17. Trusted by 10 active installations.
Benchmark data measured in an isolated Docker environment (WordPress 6.8, PHP 8.3, GeneratePress). See our full methodology.
Find slow plugins on your own site
WP Multitool scans your WordPress site for slow queries, memory hogs, and performance bottlenecks - in one click.
Want a real human to dig into your specific site?
I offer a WordPress performance audit - slow queries, plugin overhead, autoload bloat. Written report, prioritized fix list. $299 flat, 48h turnaround.
Alternatives to Machine Learning Antispam
| Plugin | Speed Score | Active Installs |
|---|---|---|
| Wordfence Security | C+ | 5M+ |
| Really Simple Security | B+ | 3M+ |
| Hostinger Tools | A- | 3M+ |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Machine Learning Antispam safe to keep activated on production sites?
What makes Machine Learning Antispam faster than similar plugins?
Does Machine Learning Antispam slow down WordPress?
Is Machine Learning Antispam still maintained?
What are the best alternatives to Machine Learning Antispam?
Plugin reviews, speed optimization guides, and error debugging — straight to your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We respect your privacy.